Passive Voice in Copywriting: When to Use It and When to Cut It
Passive voice isn't always wrong — but it's often the reason your copy feels flat. Here's how to spot it, fix it, and know when to leave it alone.
Every writing guide tells you to avoid passive voice. Most of them don't explain why — or when the rule doesn't apply.
The result is writers who either ignore the advice entirely or apply it so rigidly that they produce awkward sentences trying to avoid a construction that would have been perfectly fine.
Here's a clearer way to think about it.
What Passive Voice Actually Is
Passive voice is when the subject of a sentence receives the action rather than performing it.
Active: The team launched the product.
Passive: The product was launched by the team.
In the active version, the subject (the team) does something. In the passive version, the subject (the product) has something done to it.
The grammatical marker is usually a form of "to be" (is, was, were, has been, will be) combined with a past participle (launched, written, approved, reviewed). When you see that pattern, you're likely looking at passive voice.
Why Passive Voice Weakens Copy
It buries the actor
In most copy, the actor matters. Who did this? Who's responsible? Who's making the promise?
"Your data is protected" sounds reassuring until you ask: protected by whom? By what? The passive construction lets the writer avoid answering.
"We protect your data with 256-bit encryption" is more specific, more credible, and harder to dismiss.
It adds words without adding meaning
Passive constructions are almost always longer than their active equivalents. "The report was written by our research team" takes eight words to say what "Our research team wrote the report" says in six.
In copy, every extra word is a small tax on the reader's attention. Passive voice collects that tax repeatedly.
It creates distance
Active voice puts the reader in the middle of the action. Passive voice creates a layer of abstraction between the reader and what's happening.
"You'll get your results in 30 seconds" feels immediate. "Results will be delivered within 30 seconds" feels like a terms-and-conditions document.
It can feel evasive
Passive voice is the grammatical structure of choice for anyone who wants to acknowledge something happened without saying who did it. "Mistakes were made." "The data was mishandled." "The deadline was missed."
Readers have learned to notice this. When your copy uses passive voice in contexts where accountability matters, it can read as evasive even when you don't intend it that way.
How to Spot Passive Voice in Your Own Writing
The fastest method: search for forms of "to be" followed by a past participle.
Look for: is/are/was/were/has been/have been/will be + [verb ending in -ed or irregular past form]
- "is reviewed" → passive
- "was approved" → passive
- "has been updated" → passive
- "will be sent" → passive
Then ask: who is doing the reviewing, approving, updating, sending? If you can answer that question and the answer matters, rewrite the sentence to put that actor in the subject position.
How to Rewrite Passive Constructions
The fix is usually straightforward: find the actor, move it to the front.
Before: "Your account will be activated within 24 hours."
After: "We'll activate your account within 24 hours."
Before: "The analysis is generated automatically."
After: "Prosebot.ai generates the analysis automatically."
Before: "Errors are highlighted in real time."
After: "The tool highlights errors in real time."
In each case, the active version is shorter, clearer, and more direct. It also makes a stronger implicit promise — there's a named actor who is doing the thing.
When Passive Voice Is the Right Choice
Here's the part most writing guides skip: passive voice is sometimes correct. Knowing when to use it is as important as knowing when to cut it.
When the actor is unknown or irrelevant
"The package was shipped on Monday." If you don't know who shipped it, or if it doesn't matter, passive voice is fine. Forcing an active construction here ("Someone shipped the package on Monday") is awkward and adds nothing.
When you want to emphasize the object, not the actor
"The award was given to our CEO" puts the focus on the CEO. "The board gave the award to our CEO" puts the focus on the board. If the CEO is the point, passive voice serves you better.
When the actor is your reader
"You will be redirected to the checkout page" is technically passive, but it's also clear and natural. Rewriting it as "The system will redirect you to the checkout page" doesn't improve anything.
In formal or technical writing
Legal documents, scientific papers, and some technical documentation use passive voice deliberately to create a tone of objectivity. "The sample was tested at 37°C" is standard in a lab report. In that context, active voice would feel out of place.
When active voice sounds accusatory
"You entered the wrong password" is technically active, but it can feel like blame. "The password entered was incorrect" softens the message. In customer-facing error messages and support copy, this kind of passive construction is often the better choice.
The Real Rule
The real rule isn't "never use passive voice." It's "use passive voice intentionally."
When you write a passive construction, ask yourself: am I doing this because it's the best way to express this idea, or am I doing it because I haven't thought carefully about who the actor is?
If it's the former, keep it. If it's the latter, rewrite it.
Most passive voice in marketing copy falls into the second category. Writers reach for passive constructions when they're not sure who's making a promise, when they want to sound formal, or when they're writing quickly and not thinking about sentence structure.
The fix is to slow down, identify the actor, and put them in the subject position. Your copy will be shorter, clearer, and more credible.
A Quick Exercise
Take a piece of copy you've written recently — a landing page, an email, a product description — and run a passive voice audit.
- Find every instance of "to be" + past participle
- For each one, ask: who is the actor?
- If the actor matters and you can name them, rewrite the sentence
- If the actor is unknown, irrelevant, or if the passive construction genuinely serves the sentence, leave it
You'll probably find that 80% of your passive constructions can be cut or rewritten. The remaining 20% are there for a reason.
Prosebot.ai automatically flags passive voice in your copy and shows you exactly where to make changes. Check your copy for free.
Explore Topics
Written by
The Prosebot.ai Team
Content creator and writer sharing insights and stories.
